Payment Processor Account Freeze Demand Letters
Stripe, PayPal, Square & Other Payment Platform Disputes
| Trigger | Processor Concern | Typical Duration |
|---|---|---|
| High chargeback ratio | Exceeding 1% chargeback rate; fraud concerns | 30-180 day hold |
| Sudden volume spike | Rapid increase in transaction volume (10x+ growth) | 7-30 day review |
| Restricted business type | CBD, adult, nutraceuticals, high-risk verticals | Immediate termination |
| Customer complaints | Multiple refund requests, BBB complaints, disputes | 30-90 day hold |
| Identity verification failure | Unable to verify business legitimacy, owner identity | Immediate freeze until verified |
| Terms of service violation | Prohibited products, deceptive practices, policy breach | Termination + 90-180 day hold |
- Merchant agreement: Processors reserve right to hold funds, terminate accounts per TOS
- Reserve requirements: Processors can impose rolling reserves (5-30% of transactions held)
- Arbitration clauses: Most processor agreements require arbitration, waive class actions
- State law claims: Breach of contract, bad faith, conversion, unfair competition (state-specific)
- Federal claims: Limited; processors not subject to banking regulations for most disputes
| Platform | Standard Hold | Extended Hold (High Risk) |
|---|---|---|
| Stripe | 90 days after termination | 120-180 days for high chargeback merchants |
| PayPal | 180 days standard reserve | Up to 180 days + additional review period |
| Square | 30-90 days after termination | 120 days for elevated risk |
| Authorize.Net | Determined by acquiring bank (varies) | 180 days typical |
- Read termination notice: Identify stated reason for freeze/termination
- Review merchant agreement: Understand processor’s contractual rights and your obligations
- Preserve evidence: Download all transaction records, customer communications, shipping confirmations
- Calculate frozen funds: How much is held? What is stated release date?
- Identify alternative processor: Don’t rely on appeal succeeding; secure backup payment processing
- File internal appeal: Use processor’s dispute resolution system first (exhaustion requirement)
Effective appeals address processor’s specific concern with concrete evidence:
| Freeze Reason | Evidence to Submit |
|---|---|
| High chargebacks | Proof of product delivery (tracking, signed receipts); customer service logs showing resolution attempts; improved fraud prevention measures implemented |
| Volume spike | Explanation for growth (viral marketing, seasonal, legitimate business expansion); supporting documentation (press coverage, ads, customer acquisition records) |
| Restricted business | Clarify product/service falls outside prohibited categories; cite TOS sections allowing your business type; evidence of compliance (age verification, licensing) |
| Customer complaints | Refund policy documentation; customer service response times; resolution of specific complaints; testimonials from satisfied customers |
| Identity verification | Government ID, business formation documents, proof of address, tax records, beneficial ownership documentation |
Each platform has specific procedures:
- Stripe: Email support with “Account Review Request” + evidence package; escalate to legal@stripe.com if denied
- PayPal: Submit through Resolution Center; request supervisor review; escalate to Office of Executive Escalations
- Square: Reply to termination email with appeal; request Account Review team involvement
- Other processors: Follow stated appeals process in termination notice; document all communications
If internal appeal fails or is ignored, formal demand letter sets stage for litigation/arbitration:
- Breach of contract: Processor terminated without cause or failed to follow own TOS procedures
- Bad faith: Unreasonable freeze duration; failure to investigate evidence; arbitrary enforcement
- Conversion: Holding funds beyond reasonable reserve period without justification
- Unfair competition (CA): Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §17200 – unfair business practice
- Damages: Frozen funds + lost business revenue + cost of alternative processing + interest
- Reserve period expires: 90-180 days passes with no chargebacks or claims
- Chargeback window closes: Credit card network chargeback period ends (typically 120 days from transaction)
- No basis for hold: Processor cannot articulate specific fraud/chargeback risk
- Settlement or court order: Negotiated release or court-ordered return of funds
Payment processors have valid business and regulatory reasons to freeze merchant accounts:
- Fraud prevention: Protect cardholders from merchant fraud; reduce chargeback liability
- Network compliance: Visa/Mastercard rules require processors to maintain low overall chargeback ratios
- KYC/AML requirements: Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering regulations require identity verification
- Risk management: Sudden volume spikes may indicate stolen account, money laundering, or fraud
- Prohibited businesses: Card networks prohibit certain business types (illegal products, high-risk services)
| Practice | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Clear TOS disclosure | Merchant agreement should specify reserve periods, freeze triggers, appeal rights |
| Risk-based holds | Tailor reserve percentage and duration to actual chargeback/fraud risk (not blanket 180 days) |
| Provide specific reasons | Termination notice should cite exact TOS violation or risk factor (not vague “high risk”) |
| Allow appeals | Fair process: accept evidence, review within reasonable time, explain decision |
| Release funds promptly | Once chargeback window closes and no claims pending, release remaining balance |
When merchant challenges freeze via demand letter or arbitration:
- Document freeze basis: Specific chargebacks, fraud indicators, TOS violations
- Show TOS compliance: Freeze/termination followed procedures in merchant agreement
- Demonstrate risk: Chargeback ratio, complaints, fraud reports justify hold period
- Offer early release: If merchant provides proof of legitimacy, consider partial release or shortened hold
- Settlement value: Litigation/arbitration is expensive; releasing portion of funds may be cheaper than defending
- Broad TOS language: Agreement allows termination “for any reason” or “at our discretion”
- Arbitration clause: Forces dispute into arbitration (expensive for merchants)
- Reasonable reserve: 90-180 day hold is standard to cover chargeback window
- Legitimate business decision: Termination based on risk assessment, not arbitrary
- No damages: Merchant has no right to use specific payment processor; can use alternatives
| Claim | Basis | Damages |
|---|---|---|
| Breach of Contract | Processor terminated without cause or violated own TOS procedures | Frozen funds + lost revenue + consequential damages |
| Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith | Processor acted in bad faith (arbitrary enforcement, no investigation) | Contract damages + possibly punitive (jurisdiction-dependent) |
| Conversion | Wrongful withholding of merchant’s funds beyond reasonable period | Amount wrongfully withheld + interest |
| Unfair Competition (CA Bus. & Prof. Code §17200) | Unfair business practice: unreasonable freeze, lack of due process | Restitution (return of funds) + injunctive relief |
| Tortious Interference | Processor’s actions interfered with merchant’s customer relationships | Lost business value + reputation damages |
Most processor agreements require arbitration:
- Stripe: Binding arbitration (AAA rules); merchant pays filing fee ($200-$300)
- PayPal: Arbitration for claims over $10,000; small claims court allowed for smaller amounts
- Square: Arbitration required; opt-out provision within 60 days of account creation (rarely used)
Arbitration Pros:
- Faster resolution (6-12 months vs. 2-3 years for litigation)
- Lower cost (if claim is under $75k, may be similar to litigation cost)
- Can compel document production from processor
- Arbitrator may be more sophisticated in fintech disputes than judge/jury
Arbitration Cons:
- Filing fees ($200-$2,000 depending on claim amount)
- Limited discovery compared to litigation
- No appeal (arbitration award is final)
- Processor has repeat-player advantage (same arbitrators see same defense lawyers)
For frozen amounts under state small claims limits:
- California: Up to $10,000 (or $5,000 for businesses in some counties)
- Advantages: Low filing fee ($30-$100); no attorney required; fast hearing (60-90 days)
- Strategy: Sue for conversion + breach; bring all evidence to hearing; request immediate judgment
- Processor response: May remove to arbitration if amount claimed exceeds small claims threshold
- Litigation cost: Processor’s legal defense will cost $20k-$50k+; settling for partial release may be cheaper
- Bad publicity: Processors sensitive to reputation; public disputes, social media pressure, media coverage can motivate settlement
- Regulatory complaints: File complaints with CFPB, state attorney general, BBB; processors track complaint metrics
- Pattern and practice: If processor has history of similar freezes, class action potential creates settlement pressure
- Early release offer: Propose reduced hold period (e.g., 30 days instead of 180) + modest reserve percentage
Parallel to legal action, file complaints with:
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB): Online complaint portal; CFPB forwards to processor requiring response
- State Attorney General: Consumer protection division; some states actively investigate payment processor practices
- Better Business Bureau: Processors maintain BBB ratings; complaint may prompt outreach from executive escalations team
- FTC: For deceptive practices claims (less effective for individual disputes)
Merchants win when they can show:
- Processor provided no specific evidence of fraud/chargebacks
- Freeze was pretextual or arbitrary
- Hold period far exceeds reasonable chargeback reserve (e.g., 180 days when merchant has 0% chargeback rate)
- Processor violated own TOS procedures (e.g., didn’t allow appeal)
- Business is legitimate with strong documentation
Processors win when they show:
- High chargeback ratio or fraud indicators
- Merchant violated TOS (restricted business type, fraudulent conduct)
- Broad TOS language allows termination “at any time for any reason”
- Reserve period is standard (90-180 days) and reasonable
- Merchant received notice and opportunity to appeal
I represent merchants in disputes with Stripe, PayPal, Square, and other payment processors. I handle demand letters, arbitration, and litigation to recover frozen funds and business damages.
- Draft and send demand letters to Stripe, PayPal, Square, Authorize.Net, and other processors
- File and prosecute arbitration claims under processor merchant agreements
- Negotiate early release of frozen funds or reduced hold periods
- Pursue breach of contract, conversion, and unfair competition claims
- Represent merchants in small claims court (for claims under jurisdictional limits)
- File regulatory complaints with CFPB, state AG, and FTC
- Advise on alternative payment processing options during dispute
- Defend account freeze and termination decisions
- Draft and enforce merchant agreement terms of service
- Respond to merchant demand letters and arbitration demands
- Advise on compliance with card network rules and banking regulations
- Negotiate settlements with high-value merchants
- Defend regulatory investigations and class actions
- Demand letter: Flat fee ($1,500-$3,000 depending on complexity)
- Arbitration: Hybrid fee (flat fee for filing + hourly for hearings, or contingency for high-value cases)
- Small claims representation: Flat fee ($1,000-$2,000)
- Litigation (if arbitration waived): Hourly or contingency depending on case strength
| Stage | Timeline |
|---|---|
| Demand letter preparation and sending | 3-5 days |
| Processor response (if any) | 10-30 days |
| Arbitration filing | Immediately after demand rejected |
| Arbitration hearing scheduled | 3-6 months after filing |
| Arbitration award issued | 30-60 days after hearing |
| Total time to resolution | 4-9 months (arbitration) or 12-24 months (litigation) |
- Stripe account freeze ($150k frozen) – negotiated 30-day early release
- PayPal 180-day reserve dispute – arbitration resulted in immediate fund release + $40k damages
- Square termination (MATCH list placement) – overturned termination, account reinstated
- High-risk processor disputes (CBD, nutraceuticals, subscription businesses)
- Multi-merchant class investigation (pattern of unreasonable freezes)
Book a call to discuss your payment processor freeze. I’ll review the termination notice, assess your legal options, and recommend whether to pursue arbitration or negotiate settlement.
Email: owner@terms.law