How To Respond Premises Liability Demand Letter
You received a slip and fall demand letter: When a customer, tenant, or guest sends a demand letter claiming they were injured on your property, you need to respond strategically. Ignoring the letter can result in litigation, adverse inference, and increased liability exposure. Admitting fault or making unguarded statements can waive insurance coverage and create unnecessary liability.
This guide walks through the first 48-72 hours after receiving a premises liability demand letter, liability analysis, insurance notification, evidence preservation, and strategic response options. Whether you’re a store owner, landlord, property manager, or small business owner, these steps protect your interests and minimize exposure.
I advise property owners and businesses on responding to demand letters. This page covers general U.S. defense strategy. For California-specific issues, consult California-focused resources or legal counsel familiar with California premises liability law.
The first few days after receiving a demand letter are critical. Missteps during this period can create liability, waive insurance coverage, or destroy evidence.
Most property owners and businesses have liability insurance that covers slip and fall claims. Timely notice to your insurer is essential—late notice can result in denial of coverage.
| Policy Type | Who Has It | What It Covers |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial General Liability (CGL) | Businesses, stores, restaurants | Bodily injury on business premises, products liability, advertising injury |
| Landlord / Rental Property Insurance | Landlords, property owners | Tenant and guest injuries on rental property, property damage |
| Homeowners Insurance | Homeowners | Liability for injuries on homeowner’s property (guests, visitors) |
| Umbrella / Excess Liability | Property owners, businesses with high exposure | Additional coverage above CGL or homeowners limits |
Multiple parties may share liability and insurance obligations:
- Landlord vs tenant: If you lease property, check lease for indemnity provisions and whether landlord or tenant is responsible for premises maintenance. Landlord may be additional insured on tenant’s policy (or vice versa).
- Property manager: If property manager handles maintenance, they may have separate liability policy and may be obligated to indemnify you.
- Contractors: If janitorial, landscaping, snow removal, or other contractors were responsible for maintaining the area where claimant fell, they may share liability. Check contracts for indemnity and additional insured provisions.
- Umbrella policies: If claim exceeds your primary policy limits, check whether you have umbrella or excess liability coverage.
Once evidence is preserved and insurer is notified, analyze liability. Not all slip and fall claims have merit. Many can be defended successfully based on lack of notice, comparative negligence, or absence of dangerous condition.
- No notice: You did not create, know about, or have reason to know about the hazard. Lack of notice bars liability in most states.
- No dangerous condition: Condition was not actually dangerous, was a minor imperfection, or was within normal tolerances.
- Open and obvious: Hazard was so obvious that claimant should have seen and avoided it. Open and obvious doctrine bars or reduces recovery in many states.
- Adequate warning: You provided adequate warning (cones, signs, tape, barriers) even if hazard was not immediately repaired.
- Comparative negligence: Claimant was distracted, ignoring warnings, intoxicated, or otherwise at fault. Reduces or bars recovery depending on state’s comparative fault rules.
- No causation: Hazard did not cause fall (e.g., claimant tripped on own feet, had medical episode, slipped on something they brought onto property).
- Reasonable inspections: You had reasonable inspection and maintenance procedures, and hazard appeared immediately before fall (no time to discover or fix).
Even if liability is questionable, evaluate claimant’s claimed damages:
- Injury severity: Fractures, surgery, permanent disability = high damages. Sprains, strains, soft tissue = moderate. Bruises only = minimal.
- Medical treatment: ER, specialists, surgery, PT = substantial bills. Urgent care or PCP only = lower bills. No treatment or long gaps = weak claim.
- Pre-existing conditions: Do medical records show prior injuries to same body part? Pre-existing conditions reduce damages (you’re only liable for aggravation, not pre-existing condition).
- Lost wages: Do they have employer letter and pay stubs? Self-employed claims are harder to verify. No lost wages if they continued working.
- Plaintiff credibility: Prior personal injury claims? Criminal history? Social media showing activities inconsistent with claimed injuries? Credibility affects settlement value.
Once you receive a demand letter, you have a legal duty to preserve evidence relevant to the claim. Destroying evidence (even inadvertently) can result in adverse inference, sanctions, or default judgment.
- Surveillance video: All security camera footage from cameras covering the incident area, from several hours before through several hours after the fall. Copy to external drive or cloud storage immediately (video often overwrites within 7-90 days).
- Incident reports: Any reports filed by employees, managers, or security about the incident.
- Sweep and inspection logs: Paper or electronic logs showing when employees inspected or cleaned the area where claimant fell.
- Maintenance records: Work orders, repair invoices, contractor agreements, janitorial schedules related to the hazard or area.
- Employee schedules: Who was working at time of incident? Who was assigned to maintain the area?
- Prior complaints: Customer/tenant complaints about same hazard or location, internal memos about needed repairs.
- Photos and physical evidence: Photos of scene, hazard (if not yet repaired), warning signs. Preserve broken equipment, defective mats, etc.
- Training materials: Employee safety training, hazard identification protocols, spill response procedures.
After notifying insurer, preserving evidence, and analyzing liability, you (or your insurer) must decide how to respond to the demand letter. Response options range from outright denial to settlement negotiation.
When to use: Strong liability defenses (no notice, no dangerous condition, open and obvious, comparative negligence bars recovery), minimal injuries, or no credible evidence.
What it looks like:
- Written response denying all liability and rejecting demand
- Cite specific defenses: lack of notice, no dangerous condition, comparative fault, failure to prove causation
- Attach supporting evidence: surveillance video stills, sweep logs, photos showing no hazard or adequate warnings
- Reserve all rights and defenses, note willingness to defend in litigation if claimant files suit
When to use: Liability is uncertain, injuries are not fully documented, or you need more information to evaluate the claim.
What it looks like:
- Acknowledge receipt of demand letter
- Request additional documentation: complete medical records (not just summaries), itemized billing, EOBs, wage loss verification, incident photos, witness statements
- Do not admit or deny liability yet—state investigation is ongoing
- Reserve all rights and defenses
- Set timeline for claimant to provide requested documents (e.g., 30 days)
When to use: Liability is clear or disputed but risky, injuries are substantial, and settlement is cheaper than litigation defense costs.
Settlement considerations:
- Defense costs: Even if you win at trial, litigation costs (attorney fees, expert witnesses, discovery) can exceed nuisance settlement value.
- Nuisance value: For weak claims with minimal injuries, offering $2,500-$10,000 to settle may be cheaper than defending (which can cost $20K-$50K+).
- Policy limits exposure: If injuries are severe and liability is clear, settlement may be necessary to avoid excess verdict beyond policy limits.
- Comparative fault: If liability is disputed (e.g., claimant was 40% at fault), negotiate reduced settlement reflecting comparative fault.
When to use: Injuries are minor, liability is uncertain, and you want to resolve claim quickly without admitting fault.
What is med-pay: Many CGL and homeowners policies include medical payments coverage (usually $1,000-$5,000) that pays claimant’s medical bills regardless of fault. Med-pay is not an admission of liability.
- Offer to pay claimant’s medical bills up to med-pay limit (e.g., $5,000)
- Require claimant to sign full release of all claims
- No admission of liability—med-pay is “no-fault” coverage
- Quick, low-cost resolution for minor injury claims
Most demand letters include 30-day deadlines for response. However, these deadlines are not legally binding (unless contractually required). You can respond on your own timeline.
- Acknowledge receipt: Send brief acknowledgment within a few days stating you received demand and are investigating. This shows you’re not ignoring claim.
- Request extension if needed: If insurer investigation takes longer than 30 days, request extension (most claimants will agree to 60-90 days).
- Do not rush to settle: Take time to evaluate liability, review all evidence, and get insurer’s input. Hasty settlements often overpay.
- But do not ignore: Even though deadline is not binding, ignoring demand entirely can lead to litigation, spoliation sanctions, or adverse inference.
Most premises liability claims are handled by your insurer’s claims adjuster and in-house or panel counsel. However, some cases warrant retaining outside counsel early:
| Counsel Type | Who Pays | Who They Represent |
|---|---|---|
| Defense counsel (appointed by insurer) | Insurer pays | You (the insured), but insurer controls litigation strategy and settlement authority. Conflict of interest may arise if policy limits at risk. |
| Personal counsel (your own attorney) | You pay | You exclusively. No conflict with insurer. Advises on excess exposure, bad faith claims, and protecting your personal assets. |
No. The 30-day deadline in most demand letters is not legally binding (unless you have a contract requiring response within specific timeframe). You can respond on your own timeline.
However:
- Acknowledge receipt promptly (within a few days) to show you’re not ignoring the claim
- Request extension if you need more time to investigate (most claimants will agree to 60-90 days)
- Do not ignore demand entirely—this can lead to litigation and adverse inference
Strategy tip: Taking time to thoroughly investigate and gather evidence often strengthens your defense and reduces settlement pressure.
No. Do not apologize, either verbally or in writing. Even well-intentioned apologies can be used as admissions of fault.
Why apologies are dangerous:
- “I’m sorry” can be interpreted as admission you were negligent
- Admissions can waive insurance coverage (policies often exclude voluntary admissions of liability)
- Apologies can establish liability in court (used as evidence of fault)
What you can say: Express concern for their well-being (“I hope you’re okay”) without admitting fault or apologizing. Better yet, say nothing and let your insurer handle all communications.
No. If the demand letter is signed by an attorney, you cannot contact the claimant directly. Attorney ethics rules prohibit contact with represented parties without their attorney’s consent.
Consequences of improper contact:
- Claimant’s attorney can move to exclude any statements you obtain
- Your own attorney (if you have one) can face discipline for allowing improper contact
- Can result in sanctions or adverse inference at trial
If claimant contacts you: Politely refer them to your insurer or attorney. Do not discuss the incident or respond to questions.
If you have no liability insurance, you are personally responsible for defending the claim and paying any settlement or judgment. This creates significant financial risk.
Steps if uninsured:
- Consult an attorney immediately: Hire personal injury defense attorney to evaluate claim and advise on response strategy
- Gather evidence: Preserve surveillance video, sweep logs, witness statements to build defense
- Consider settlement: If liability is clear and injuries substantial, early settlement (even costly) may be cheaper than defending lawsuit and risking six-figure judgment
- Asset protection: Consult with attorney about protecting personal assets (home, savings) from judgment
Future: Obtain liability insurance (CGL, landlord, or homeowners) immediately to protect against future claims.
Yes, in two situations:
1. Judgment exceeds policy limits: If jury awards $1 million and your policy limit is $300,000, you are personally liable for the $700,000 excess.
2. Insurer denies coverage: If insurer successfully asserts policy exclusion or you violated policy terms (e.g., late notice, failure to cooperate), you may have no coverage and be personally liable.
Protecting yourself from excess liability:
- Purchase adequate liability limits (consider umbrella policy for additional coverage)
- If claim approaches policy limits, hire personal counsel to monitor insurer’s handling
- Consider demanding insurer settle within limits to avoid bad faith exposure
- If insurer refuses reasonable settlement within limits, you may have bad faith claim against insurer for excess judgment
No. Most states prohibit retaliatory eviction when tenant asserts legal rights, including premises liability claims.
Retaliation is illegal and creates additional liability:
- Eviction, lease non-renewal, rent increase, or harassment shortly after tenant sends demand letter is presumed retaliation
- Tenant can sue for wrongful eviction, emotional distress, and attorney fees
- Courts may order reinstatement, damages, and punitive damages
What you CAN do:
- Defend the premises liability claim on its merits
- If tenant violates lease (nonpayment, unauthorized occupants, damage), you can evict for those reasons—but document legitimate reasons carefully to rebut retaliation claims
- At lease expiration, you can choose not to renew (but courts may still presume retaliation if timing is close to demand letter)
Best practice: Treat tenant normally, continue normal landlord-tenant relationship, and let your insurer handle the injury claim separately from tenancy issues.