Landlord refusing to allow my ESA despite having valid therapist documentation - what are my options in California?

I have been dealing with anxiety and depression for several years and my licensed therapist wrote me a letter recommending an emotional support animal. The letter is on her official letterhead, states her license number, confirms I have a disability-related need, and recommends the ESA as part of my treatment.

My landlord is refusing to allow my dog, saying the building has a "strict no-pets policy" and that "ESA letters are just a way to get around the rules." He threatened to evict me if I bring a dog into the apartment.

I've been a perfect tenant for 2 years - always pay rent on time, no complaints. The building has about 20 units.

What are my rights here? Can he actually evict me?

Fwiw update: I sent my landlord a written request via email and certified mail. I cited teh Fair Housing Act and FEHA, attached my therapist's letter, and requested a response within 10 days sadly.

He responded saying he's "consulting with his attorney" and that I should "reconsider" because fighting this will "make things difficult" for me going forward. That sounds like a threat?

Good news update! After his attorney apparently talked some sense into him, my landlord sent me a letter approving the ESA. No pet deposit, no pet rent.

He did include a bunch of conditions like "animal must be on leash in common areas" and "tenant responsible for any damage" which I think are reasonable.

My dog moved in last weekend. Thanks everyone for the advice and encouragement. Standing up for my rights was scary but worth it.

Found this thread while researching my own ESA situation. This is incredibly helpful. One question - does this apply if my landlord lives in the building? Mine is a 6-unit building and the owner lives in one of the units.

Good question. The FHA has an exemption for owner-occupied buildings with 4 or fewer units (the "Mrs. Murphy exemption"). Since your building has 6 units, you're still protected under federal law even though the owner lives there.

Also, California's FEHA has no such exemption, so even in smaller owner-occupied buildings, you'd still have state law protection in California.