Ngl i run a talent management agency representing about 40 creators and influencers, so I review these contracts daily. The terms you are describing are unfortunately very common in brand deals, but several of them are increasingly being challenged successfully.
The biggest red flags I see in influencer contracts are perpetual content licenses where the brand can use your content forever without additional payment, broad exclusivity windows that prevent you from working with competitors for months, and assignment clauses that let the brand transfer the contract to any third party. If your contract has any of these, you have strong arguments for unconscionability, especially if you did not have legal representation during negotiation.
Regarding the 122K dispute amount, this is well above the threshold where it makes sense to hire an entertainment or media attorney. Many of them work on contingency for creator disputes because brands frequently settle once proper legal representation gets involved. The FTC has also been increasingly active in investigating unfair contract terms in influencer marketing, so there may be regulatory pressure you can leverage.
One practical tip: document everything about how the contract was presented to you. If it was a take-it-or-leave-it deal with no opportunity to negotiate, if you were given a short deadline to sign, or if key terms were buried in dense legalese, all of these factors support an unconscionability argument. Courts are becoming more sympathetic to individual creators who signed overreaching agreements with large companies that had vastly superior bargaining power.