AB5 for Staffing Agencies & Managed Service Providers

Staffing agencies, temp agencies, and managed service providers (MSPs) occupy a unique position under AB5. Unlike most industries, the staffing model specifically involves placing workers at client sites - which raises both AB5 and joint employment questions.

The Staffing Agency Model Under AB5

Key Distinction: When staffing agencies place workers at client companies, those workers are typically employees OF THE STAFFING AGENCY, not independent contractors. AB5's primary impact is on agencies that try to classify placed workers as contractors.

Legitimate Staffing Agency Model

In a compliant model:

Problematic "Payrolling" Model

Some arrangements are problematic:

Joint Employer Liability

Both Agency AND Client May Be Liable

Under California law, both the staffing agency and the client company can be held jointly liable as "employers" for wage and hour violations if both exercise control over workers.

Factor Agency Responsibility Client Responsibility
Hiring/Firing Usually agency Often shared
Day-to-Day Supervision Sometimes Usually client
Payroll/Benefits Agency Funded by client
Work Schedules Sometimes Usually client
Workplace Safety Shared Shared

Managed Service Provider (MSP) Considerations

What is an MSP?

MSPs manage contingent workforce programs, often coordinating multiple staffing suppliers and contractors. They may also directly engage workers.

MSP Compliance Issues

The B2B Exemption for Staffing

In limited circumstances, the B2B exemption may apply when an agency contracts with an incorporated consulting firm rather than individual workers:

Best Practices

  1. Employ Placed Workers: Make temporary workers W-2 employees of the agency
  2. Written Agreements: Clear contracts with client companies
  3. Allocation of Duties: Define who controls what aspects
  4. Compliance Programs: Regular audits of worker classifications
  5. Insurance: EPLI coverage for both parties
  6. Indemnification: Address liability allocation in contracts