Asset Protection DAPTs | Dynasty Trusts | Children's Trusts | Cross-Border Planning
Nevada Domestic Asset Protection Trusts (DAPTs) under NRS Chapter 166
A Nevada Domestic Asset Protection Trust (DAPT) is a self-settled, irrevocable spendthrift trust governed by Nevada Revised Statutes Chapter 166. It allows you—the person creating the trust—to also be a discretionary beneficiary while protecting the trust assets from many types of creditor claims.
Doctors, surgeons, dentists, and other healthcare providers facing high malpractice exposure use Nevada DAPTs to shield personal wealth from professional liability claims.
Owners of operating companies (construction, logistics, healthcare, SaaS, e-commerce) move personal assets into DAPTs to separate business risk from family wealth.
Investors with multiple rental properties and development projects use Nevada trusts to protect liquid capital and investment accounts from tenant claims and construction lawsuits.
Attorneys, CPAs, financial advisors, and other professionals in litigation-heavy fields shield personal assets from malpractice and E&O exposure.
Content creators, influencers, and digital entrepreneurs protect against defamation claims, IP disputes, and business creditors.
Business owners who have personally guaranteed loans or leases separate safe assets from personal guarantee exposure.
Plan Early: The best time to establish a Nevada DAPT is before any claims or litigation arise. Transfers made "on the eve" of trouble face significant creditor-challenge risk.
Federal Bankruptcy Lookback: Even if Nevada law allows a short limitations period, federal Bankruptcy Code § 548(e) permits a 10-year lookback for self-settled trusts if actual fraudulent intent is proven.
Not a Last-Minute Fix: Nevada DAPTs are powerful planning tools for proactive asset protection, not "emergency shields" after problems have already started.
Most effective Nevada DAPTs are integrated with LLC/FLP structures to separate risky operating assets from protected trust assets:
| Requirement | Why It Matters | Common Mistakes to Avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Real Nevada Trustee | Not just a nominal appointment—Nevada law requires at least one qualified Nevada trustee (individual resident or licensed trust company) who actively participates in administration | Using an out-of-state friend or relative with no Nevada connection; appointing a Nevada trustee but handling everything yourself |
| Nevada Situs & Administration | Trust records, accounts, and decision-making must be in Nevada to ensure Nevada law governs | Keeping all trust records, accounts, and meetings in your home state; only having a Nevada "address" without real Nevada administration |
| Separate Trust Accounts | Trust assets must be held in trust name, not commingled with personal accounts | Treating the trust like a personal checking account; moving money in and out without trustee approval or documentation |
| Documented Trustee Discretion | Distributions to settlor must be genuinely discretionary, with trustee making independent decisions | Pre-arranging regular distributions; settlor demanding/directing payments; no written trustee minutes or resolutions |
| Ongoing Formalities | Trustees should hold meetings (or document decisions), maintain records, file trust tax returns, and follow trust instrument provisions | No trustee meetings, minutes, or annual reviews; treating the trust as a "set it and forget it" structure |
Courts scrutinize self-settled trusts to see if the settlor retained de facto control. If you can:
...a court may treat the trust as a sham or alter ego, ignoring the trust structure entirely. Genuine trustee independence and discretion are critical.
Multi-generational wealth transfer, trusts for children, and Nevada's 365-year rule
A Nevada dynasty trust is a long-term irrevocable trust designed to hold assets for multiple generations—children, grandchildren, and beyond—leveraging Nevada's 365-year rule against perpetuities (NRS 111.1031).
Nevada allows trusts to continue for up to approximately 365 years, far beyond the traditional "lives in being plus 21 years" rule. This enables families to:
Properly structured dynasty trusts can use generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax exemptions to shield assets from estate taxes at each generation, preserving more wealth for descendants.
Assets remain in spendthrift trust for descendants, protected from their creditors, lawsuits, and divorcing spouses (to the extent allowed by law).
Nevada corporate trustees provide institutional-quality investment management, administration, and fiduciary oversight across multiple generations.
Keep assets within the family bloodline; in-laws and ex-spouses do not receive outright ownership or control over trust assets.
Nevada trusts are widely used by parents (married, unmarried, divorced, or separated) to provide structured support for children while protecting assets from outside risks.
Parents living in California, New York, or another high-tax state establish a Nevada discretionary trust for their children to:
The Nevada trust (with Nevada situs and Nevada trustee) avoids California/New York state income tax on trust earnings and keeps assets protected as separate property if children later marry and divorce.
Parents living abroad (or split between countries) own U.S. real estate, brokerage accounts, or business interests. They establish a Nevada trust to:
A couple owns a house or investment property in personal names. They are divorcing or separating and agree to:
The Nevada trust receives net sale proceeds, not the real property itself. This ensures funds are ring-fenced for children and not subject to future fights between the parents.
| Distribution Standard | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| HEMS (Health, Education, Maintenance, Support) | Trustee can distribute for beneficiary's health, education, maintenance in accustomed standard of living, and support. This is an "ascertainable standard" under tax law. | Parents who want clear guidelines; beneficiaries who may receive assets subject to estate tax and want an ascertainable standard for estate/gift tax purposes |
| Pure Discretion | Trustee has full discretion to distribute or not distribute for any reason. No specific standard required. | Maximum flexibility; parents who want trustee to withhold funds if child develops substance abuse, spending issues, or other problems |
| Milestone-Based Distributions | Distributions tied to specific ages or events (e.g., college graduation, age 25, first home purchase, business start-up) | Parents who want to incentivize education and responsible milestones; gradual transition to full access rather than lump sums |
| Sprinkle / Spray Provisions | Trustee can "sprinkle" distributions among multiple beneficiaries based on need and circumstances | Families with multiple children; ability to adjust for different needs (e.g., one child has high medical costs, another has education costs) |
Nevada law allows settlors to delay full disclosure to beneficiaries, so young adults don't receive complete trust details at age 18 or 21.
While Nevada allows delayed notice, trustees must still act in beneficiaries' best interests and provide information when necessary. Overly restrictive "gag" provisions may be unenforceable if they prevent beneficiaries from monitoring trustee performance or protecting their interests. Work with experienced counsel to balance privacy with fiduciary duty.
| Structure | Who Controls | Creditor & Divorce Protection | Tax & Duration | Suitable For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simple Revocable Living Trust → Outright Inheritance | Grantor during life; beneficiaries receive outright at grantor's death | None for beneficiaries after they receive assets outright | No estate tax benefit; assets fully exposed to beneficiary's estate | Small estates; no creditor/divorce concerns; beneficiaries are mature and responsible |
| Third-Party Nevada Discretionary Trust for Children | Parent creates irrevocable trust for children; Nevada trustee controls | Strong: spendthrift protection from children's creditors and divorcing spouses | Out of parent's estate if properly structured; can last up to 365 years | Parents who want to protect children from creditors, divorce, and bad spending; not concerned about their own estate tax |
| Full Nevada Dynasty Trust with Sub-Trusts per Child | Multi-generational; Nevada trustee; separate sub-trust for each descendant line | Maximum: each generation receives only discretionary distributions; assets never become outright property | GST-exempt planning to avoid estate tax at each generation; 365-year duration; compounding for centuries | High-net-worth families; significant estate tax exposure; desire to control wealth for multiple generations and protect from divorce/creditors |
State income tax, trust situs rules, and planning for non-Nevada and non-U.S. settlors
Nevada imposes no state income tax on individuals or trusts, making it an attractive jurisdiction for trust situs, particularly for:
Nevada's zero income tax applies only to Nevada-source income and trusts properly administered in Nevada. Other jurisdictions may tax trust income based on:
Bottom line: Nevada situs can eliminate Nevada state tax and provide a favorable long-term framework, but proper planning with tax counsel in your home state is essential.
| Jurisdiction | State Income Tax on Trusts | Max Trust Duration | DAPT Allowed? | Key Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada | 0% | ~365 years | ✓ Yes (NRS 166) | No state income tax; short 2-year creditor limitations; strong directed-trust framework; no statutory support-creditor exceptions (though other courts may not honor this) |
| Delaware | 0% if no DE-resident grantor/beneficiary | Perpetual (no RAP) | ✓ Yes | Premier corporate/trust jurisdiction; extensive case law; Court of Chancery; similar DAPT framework but different limitations periods and creditor rules |
| South Dakota | 0% | Perpetual (no RAP) | ✓ Yes | Very strong DAPT state; favorable creditor rules; popular for dynasty trusts and wealth management |
| California | Up to 13.3% (highest in U.S.) | 90 years (since 2009) | ✗ No | High tax; does not allow self-settled DAPTs; may attempt to tax trusts with CA-resident settlor/beneficiaries even if trust is administered elsewhere |
| New York | Up to 10.9% | Perpetual (since 2019) | ✓ Yes (since 2011) | NY DAPT law allows self-settled trusts but with different rules than NV; high state tax can be avoided with proper situs planning |
A "grantor trust" is a trust where the settlor (grantor) is treated as the owner of trust assets for federal income tax purposes. This means:
For Nevada DAPTs: Many are structured as grantor trusts so the settlor pays the income tax, allowing trust assets to grow without being depleted by trust-level income tax.
A "non-grantor trust" is treated as a separate taxpayer. It files Form 1041 and pays tax on accumulated income at trust tax rates (which reach the highest federal bracket very quickly). Distributions to beneficiaries generally carry out taxable income to the beneficiaries.
For Nevada Dynasty Trusts: Non-grantor trusts in Nevada pay no Nevada state income tax and can accumulate income at trust level without state-level taxation.
Federal estate and gift tax rules (and generation-skipping transfer tax) are complex and beyond the scope of this guide. In general:
Work with an estate-planning attorney and CPA to coordinate Nevada trust structures with federal tax planning.
Non-U.S. residents and international families frequently use Nevada trusts for U.S. assets because Nevada offers:
Foreign vs Domestic Trust Classification: For U.S. tax purposes, a trust is generally "domestic" if (1) a U.S. court can exercise primary supervision over administration, AND (2) one or more U.S. persons have authority to control all substantial trust decisions. Otherwise, it may be treated as a "foreign trust" with different reporting and tax rules.
Coordination with Home-Country Tax & Immigration Law: Non-U.S. persons must coordinate Nevada trust planning with their home country's tax and estate laws, and (if planning to immigrate to the U.S.) with U.S. immigration and pre-immigration tax planning. This is highly specialized and requires cross-border tax counsel.
FATCA & CRS Reporting: Foreign nationals may face reporting obligations under U.S. FATCA rules and their home country's equivalent (Common Reporting Standard). Proper trust documentation and U.S. tax reporting (e.g., Form 3520, Form 3520-A) are critical.
Using Nevada trusts for U.S. assets when you live abroad or are planning to move to the U.S.
Nevada provides a well-regulated, politically stable legal framework with strong property rights and rule of law—critical for families concerned about political or economic instability in other jurisdictions.
Nevada has a robust ecosystem of licensed trust companies, banks with trust powers, and professional fiduciaries experienced in managing cross-border trusts and coordinating with international tax advisors.
Nevada's zero state income tax benefits international families holding U.S. investment accounts, dividend-producing stocks, or capital-gain-generating assets in a Nevada-situs trust.
Nevada operates under U.S. common law with transparent courts, predictable procedures, and extensive published case law—easier for international advisors to understand and navigate than many other jurisdictions.
A family residing in Europe, Asia, or Latin America owns:
They establish a Nevada trust to:
A family or individual plans to immigrate to the United States (on an investor visa, employment visa, or green card). Before becoming a U.S. resident, they:
This allows them to plan for U.S. tax residency and potentially shield certain non-U.S. assets from U.S. estate and gift tax, while holding U.S. assets in a Nevada structure.
Critical: Pre-immigration trust planning is highly technical and requires coordination with immigration attorneys and cross-border tax specialists. Timing of trust creation, funding, and classification can have major U.S. tax consequences.
A married couple with one U.S. citizen spouse and one non-U.S. citizen spouse often face:
A Nevada trust can be used to hold U.S.-situs assets for the family, while non-U.S. assets remain in foreign trusts or other structures, providing clear separation and simplified reporting.
For U.S. tax purposes, a trust is generally "domestic" only if:
If either test fails, the trust is a "foreign trust" and subject to additional reporting (Form 3520, Form 3520-A) and potentially different taxation. Work with cross-border tax counsel to determine classification and reporting obligations.
Many countries impose their own tax on trusts or treat trusts as transparent entities. For example:
Always coordinate Nevada trust planning with tax and legal advisors in your home country.
If you plan to become a U.S. resident or citizen, the timing of trust creation and funding can have major tax consequences under U.S. estate, gift, and income tax rules. For example:
Pre-immigration planning is a specialized area requiring coordination between immigration attorneys, cross-border tax advisors, and estate-planning counsel.
Modernizing old trusts and changing trust situs to Nevada under NRS 163.556
"Decanting" is the process of transferring assets from an old, irrevocable trust into a new trust with updated or improved terms. Think of it like pouring wine from one decanter into another—the same wine (assets), but in a better container (new trust with modern provisions).
Nevada law allows a trustee to appoint (transfer) trust property from one trust to another trust under certain conditions, even if the original trust instrument did not explicitly authorize it. Key points:
Decanting allows families to modernize old trusts without going to court for formal trust modification.
Trusts originally established in high-tax states (CA, NY, etc.) can be moved to Nevada to avoid state-level income tax on trust earnings going forward.
Older trusts created under shorter rule-against-perpetuities periods can be decanted into Nevada dynasty trusts with 365-year duration.
Add or strengthen spendthrift provisions, directed-trust features, and Nevada's creditor-protection framework.
Old trusts often have clunky distribution standards, outdated trustee provisions, or no flexibility for changed circumstances. Decanting allows updates without court approval in many cases.
Nevada's directed-trust framework allows families to appoint an investment advisor separate from the administrative trustee—ideal for entrepreneurial families who want control over investments.
Trusts in jurisdictions with hostile trust law, high costs, or unfriendly courts can be moved to Nevada for better legal framework and professional trustee access.
Depending on the original trust instrument and state law, beneficiaries may need to receive notice of the decanting, and in some cases must consent. Nevada law (and many other states) require notice to certain beneficiaries but generally do not require unanimous consent.
Work with experienced counsel to ensure proper notice, documentation, and compliance with both the old jurisdiction's law and Nevada law.
Decanting generally requires the trustee to have discretionary distribution authority. Trusts with mandatory distribution provisions, annuity trusts, or trusts where the trustee has no discretion may not be eligible for decanting under Nevada law.
Decanting is generally not a taxable event for income tax purposes if done properly, but there can be gift/estate/GST tax consequences if the new trust changes beneficial interests or extends the vesting period beyond what was originally allowed. Always coordinate with a tax advisor before decanting.
Some high-tax states (e.g., California, New York) have rules that attempt to continue taxing trusts even after they change situs, especially if the settlor or beneficiaries remain residents of the high-tax state. Simply moving the trust to Nevada does not guarantee elimination of all state tax. Proper planning and, in some cases, beneficiary relocation or restructuring may be necessary.
Beneficiaries who are unhappy with changes made via decanting (e.g., extending the trust term, changing distribution standards) may challenge the decanting as exceeding trustee authority or breaching fiduciary duty. Proper notice, documentation of reasons, and fiduciary care are essential to defend against such challenges.
When the goal is long-term control, protection, and support—not just tax planning
Special-needs trusts are designed for beneficiaries with disabilities who rely on means-tested government benefits (SSI, Medicaid). The trust supplements government benefits without disqualifying the beneficiary.
Special-needs trusts must comply with federal SSI/Medicaid rules, state Medicaid rules, and trust law. Improper drafting or administration can result in benefit disqualification. This is a specialized area requiring attorneys experienced in both disability law and Nevada trust law.
Many families use Nevada discretionary dynasty trusts to provide for children or grandchildren who struggle with:
Trustee retains full discretion over distributions for the beneficiary's lifetime. No mandatory distribution ages or amounts.
Distributions can be conditioned on sobriety, drug testing, employment, participation in treatment programs, or other benchmarks.
Nevada law allows appointment of a trust protector with powers to remove/replace trustees, modify terms, or oversee administration—providing family oversight without giving the beneficiary direct control.
Assets remain protected from the beneficiary's creditors, predatory lenders, and bad financial decisions—ensuring resources are available for genuine needs.
The goal of these trusts is to ensure the beneficiary has access to housing, healthcare, education, and quality-of-life support, while preventing outright distributions that could fuel destructive behavior. A skilled, independent trustee can balance compassion with accountability.
A charitable lead trust pays income to a charity for a term of years, with the remainder going to family members or other non-charitable beneficiaries. Benefits:
A charitable remainder trust pays income to you (or other non-charitable beneficiaries) for life or a term of years, with the remainder going to charity. Benefits:
Nevada law allows trusts for specific non-charitable purposes, such as:
These are less common but can be useful in specialized situations where traditional beneficiary-focused trusts don't fit.
For many families, charitable and special-purpose trusts are driven more by values, legacy, and long-term control than by tax savings. Nevada's flexible trust law and long trust duration make it a natural home for these structures.
How trusts interact with family law, equitable distribution, and support obligations
Nevada trusts—especially asset-protection DAPTs and children's trusts—are often used in the context of divorce, separation, and co-parenting arrangements. Understanding how these trusts interact with family law is critical.
Even if a Nevada trust is properly structured under Nevada trust law, family courts in other states (or federal courts in certain contexts) have their own frameworks for:
Family courts may disregard Nevada's creditor-protection and DAPT provisions if they conflict with strong public policy on support of children and spouses.
| Timing of Trust Creation / Funding | Risk Level | Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| Well Before Marriage | LOW | Trust created and funded before marriage is generally treated as separate property (in equitable-distribution states) or separate property (in community-property states). Low fraudulent-transfer risk. |
| Early in Marriage, No Marital Trouble | LOW-MEDIUM | If funded during calm times with no hint of divorce, courts generally respect estate-planning and asset-protection motives. Timing and documentation of intent are important. |
| During Separation Discussions | MEDIUM-HIGH | Transfers made when divorce or separation is being discussed (even informally) face scrutiny. Courts look at whether the transfer was designed to hide assets or reduce the marital estate. Proper disclosure and documentation are critical. |
| After Filing for Divorce | HIGH | Transfers to trusts after a divorce petition is filed are highly vulnerable to being set aside as fraudulent or in violation of automatic restraining orders. Courts can "unwind" such transfers and treat the assets as still in the marital estate. |
Many states impose automatic restraining orders (AROs) when a divorce is filed, prohibiting either spouse from transferring, encumbering, or hiding assets. Violating an ARO by moving assets into a trust can result in:
A married couple (or individual spouse with separate property) establishes a Nevada DAPT or children's trust well before any hint of divorce. The trust is:
Outcome: Generally respected by courts as legitimate planning, especially if both spouses consented or the funding spouse used only separate property. The trust may be considered in overall property division or support calculations, but is unlikely to be set aside.
A couple owns real estate or other assets in personal names. They are separating or divorcing and agree by written contract to:
The Nevada trust receives net sale proceeds, not the property itself.
Key Issues:
Outcome: If both parents voluntarily agree and the trust genuinely benefits the children, courts typically enforce such arrangements. The trust insulates children's funds from future disputes between the parents.
One spouse, anticipating divorce, unilaterally moves significant marital assets into a Nevada DAPT without disclosure to the other spouse or court approval.
Outcome: High risk of being set aside. Courts can:
Nevada's 2-year creditor limitations and DAPT protections do not shield against family-law equitable powers in the divorce court's own jurisdiction.
Some Nevada DAPT marketing materials claim that Nevada has "no statutory exception" for child or spousal support creditors, unlike other DAPT states. This is technically true under NRS 166, but it does not mean you can avoid support obligations by moving assets to a Nevada DAPT.
Why:
Practical Result: If you owe child or spousal support and move assets into a Nevada DAPT, a family court can still reach those assets, either by disregarding the trust or by treating trust distributions as income available for support calculations.
Courts often consider trust income and distributions when setting support obligations:
Logic and inputs for future interactive Nevada trust planning tools
This tool helps you determine which type(s) of Nevada trust best fit your goals and circumstances.
Example Output 1: Professional in High-Risk Field, Wants to Be Beneficiary
Example Output 2: HNW Family with Children & Grandchildren, Tax Planning Priority
Example Output 3: Cross-Border Family, U.S. Assets, Living Abroad
Example Output 4: Active Lawsuit or Divorce Pending
This tool assesses the risk level for establishing a Nevada DAPT based on your current creditor and litigation exposure.
Scenario 1: No Current Claims, Transfer Planned Now
Scenario 2: Active Lawsuit, Claim Arose 6 Months Ago, Planning Transfer Now
Scenario 3: Support Obligation (Child/Spousal Support)
This tool provides a conceptual illustration (not financial advice) of how a Nevada dynasty trust keeps assets protected and compounding across multiple generations compared to outright inheritance.
Scenario A: Traditional Outright Inheritance (No Dynasty Trust)
Scenario B: Nevada Dynasty Trust (365-Year Trust)
Illustrative Benefits:
This is a conceptual illustration only, not financial or legal advice. Actual results depend on federal tax law (which changes), trust drafting, investment performance, and family circumstances. Consult with estate-planning attorneys and financial advisors for personalized planning.
Professional legal services for Nevada asset protection trusts, dynasty trusts, and family planning
I'm an attorney focused on Nevada trust planning, asset protection, and cross-border estate planning. I work with:
Drafting Nevada DAPT instruments, dynasty trust agreements, children's trusts, and special-needs trusts tailored to your goals and family circumstances.
Analyzing creditor risk, timing issues, and structuring Nevada DAPTs with LLC/FLP layers for maximum protection under Nevada and federal law.
Coordinating Nevada trust structures with international tax advisors, immigration attorneys, and foreign counsel for non-U.S. families and pre-immigration planning.
Moving existing trusts to Nevada, decanting under NRS 163.556, and modernizing old trust terms for better asset protection, tax efficiency, and flexibility.
Drafting enforceable property agreements, children's trust funding arrangements, and coordinating with family-law counsel in divorce/separation scenarios.
Advising trustees and beneficiaries on fiduciary duties, distributions, tax reporting, and compliance with Nevada trust law.
30-minute consultation to discuss your goals, assess whether a Nevada trust is right for you, and outline next steps.
Book Your CallEmail: owner@terms.law
All consultations are paid attorney-led strategy sessions, not free discovery calls. Book via Calendly above or email to discuss your Nevada trust planning needs.