“Release a refund/discount or I’ll post a 1★ review.” This violates Upwork’s feedback manipulation rules and can be reported to Trust & Safety.
Service contracts are between client and freelancer. Upwork Escrow only follows its instructions; once dispute/arb windows close, you must pursue the client directly.
False accusations (“never delivered,” “stole funds”) chill future invitations, lower JSS, and in some cases justify defamation or trade-libel claims.
If escrow is funded, work is submitted, client ties payment to reviews, and Upwork dispute/support routes stall—prepare the demand letter.
Download the offer, scope, milestone notes, Work Diary, file submissions, and client acknowledgements. These establish performance.
For fixed-price, trigger Upwork’s dispute assistance before the funded milestone auto-releases. Hourly disputes hinge on Work Diary compliance.
Send Trust & Safety screenshots where the client links refunds to reviews. Cite Upwork’s ban on feedback manipulation/“feedback building.”
If a review posts, respond once, factually. “Client demanded post-delivery refund tied to feedback; work submitted as scoped.” No insults, no personal data.
Upwork offer + message thread + delivery record = enforceable contract. Non-payment after acceptance is a straightforward breach claim.
Written falsehoods (“stole money,” “never delivered”) published in reviews satisfy libel elements. Trade libel adds requirement of specific financial loss.
False reviews that scare off future Upwork clients can constitute interference with prospective economic advantage.
Using reputational threats to extract refunds resembles extortion under many penal codes. Mentioning this (carefully) underscores seriousness.
Facts → Payment breach → Feedback misconduct → False statements → Demands & deadline → Reservation of rights. Keep it readable (2–3 pages), cite exhibits if needed.
Client tied feedback to payment, funds still in escrow, review not yet posted. Push platform remedies while drafting the external letter.