Client invents a new target (“5x ROAS or we don’t pay”) after approving scope that never promised it.
They change strategy weekly, ignore advice, then blame you when the Frankenstein plan underperforms.
Internal politics kill spend, but instead of owning the decision they rebrand it as “campaign failed.”
Work is live, invoices sent, and suddenly emails vanish—your deck is in their board meeting while they pretend it “didn’t work.”
Modern agency terms (see tradition.agency) explicitly state that outcomes like revenue, traffic, rankings aren’t promised.
Courts treat marketing agreements as service contracts: you owe professional execution, not a guaranteed spike in sales (Lexology).
If scope was informal, you can still claim the reasonable value of services the client requested and is using (Cornell LII).
Clients can’t keep decks, creative, or campaigns live without paying—society disfavors that windfall (Florida Bar explainer).
Toggle the facts that match your situation:
Strategy decks, creative, and media plan approved + launched as agreed.
Performance gripes surfaced only after invoices were sent.
You noted platform/budget limits and client opted to proceed anyway.
“Finance froze spend” or “new leadership” cited > actual performance data.
Major deliverables late/unfinished? Toggle to reduce risk score.
You already proposed a concession tied to specific issues.
Recap engagement → list work delivered/approved → note “no results” clause → state unpaid invoices → propose resolution (full payment / structured plan) → reserve rights if ignored.