Responding to Employee Wage Claims: Employer Strategies and Defenses
When an employee or their attorney sends a demand letter alleging unpaid wages, overtime, or misclassification, employers face significant financial and legal exposure. California wage and hour claims carry strict liability, waiting time penalties, and mandatory attorney fees for prevailing employees, making even small claims expensive to defend.
This guide explains how to evaluate wage demand letters, identify defenses, calculate exposure, and draft strategic responses that minimize liability while preserving settlement opportunities. Whether you’re facing claims for unpaid overtime, meal/rest break violations, or independent contractor misclassification, understanding your response options is critical.
If employee was properly classified as exempt (executive, administrative, professional, outside sales, or computer professional), no overtime is owed. California exemptions require:
- Salary basis: Fixed salary, not hourly (minimum $66,560/year in 2024 for most exemptions)
- Duties test: Job duties must primarily involve exempt work (managing others, exercising discretion, professional/creative work)
- Independent judgment: Employee must have authority to make independent decisions of significance
If worker was properly classified as independent contractor, wage laws don’t apply. California AB5 (2020) imposes ABC test:
| Prong | Requirement (employer must prove ALL three) |
|---|---|
| A – Control | Worker is free from employer’s control and direction in performance of work |
| B – Usual business | Worker performs work outside the usual course of employer’s business |
| C – Independently established | Worker is customarily engaged in independently established trade, occupation, or business |
Potential liability includes multiple components:
Employee: Restaurant shift supervisor, salary $50,000/year, worked 50 hours/week for 2 years, then terminated. Claims misclassification and unpaid overtime.
Worst-case exposure:
– Unpaid OT: 10 hours/week × 104 weeks × $24/hour × 1.5 = $37,440
– Meal/rest penalties: 520 shifts × 2 violations × $24 = $24,960
– Waiting time penalty: $192/day × 30 = $5,760
– Wage statement penalties: 104 pay periods × $100 = $10,400 (capped at $4,000)
– Subtotal: $71,160
– Attorney fees (est. 1.5× damages): $106,740
TOTAL EXPOSURE: ~$178,000
• Misclassification is clear (duties don’t meet exemption test)
• Exposure exceeds settlement demand by 3×+
• Class action risk exists (other employees in same position)
• Records are incomplete or missing
• Records conclusively show all hours paid
• Claim is time-barred (over 3 years old)
• Employee’s evidence is speculative or fabricated
• Settlement demand is unreasonable relative to actual exposure
If denying claim in whole or part:
- Don’t admit liability: Even if claim has merit, admissions in response letter can be used against you in litigation. Let attorney draft response.
- Don’t retaliate: If employee is still employed, do not fire, demote, or reduce hours in response to wage claim. This creates separate retaliation claim.
- Don’t ignore statutory deadlines: California Labor Commissioner claims have specific response timelines. Missing deadline = default judgment.
- Don’t threaten frivolously: Baseless counterclaims (defamation, breach of contract) can trigger anti-SLAPP motion and fee sanctions.
I represent employers responding to wage and hour demand letters, overtime claims, and misclassification allegations. My practice focuses on evaluating exposure, identifying defenses, and negotiating cost-effective settlements while preserving litigation options.